Monday, August 4, 2008

Viewing Literature as More Than "Intellectual Artifact"

"She saw her job as the teaching of skills and terms and techniques. The students wanted to address the moral dilemmas presented in the story. Their instincts and inclinations led them to talk about the intense pressure to succeed that comes to bear upon them […] But their teacher wanted to conduct a recitation on the three techniques of characterization.”

Probst, R. (1988). Dialogue with a text. English Journal, 77(1).

“Part of the problem of students’ dislike of classic literature may—I’m hedging here—lie in outmoded and uninspiring methods of teaching that literature, an overweening focus on literary history and biography, for example; hunts for obscure symbols; lit crit kinds of activities that tease out tensions and ironies but make the book an intellectual artifact and not a living, breathing, meaningful, powerful, and potentially life-changing force for its readers.”

Hipple, T. (1996 ). It’s the that, teacher. English Journal, 86(3).


The teacher Probst refers to in this quotation is almost certainly me. I became so caught up in teaching my students theme and figurative language that I think I sucked all the fun out of reading. My students certainly viewed our books as “intellectual artifacts” as opposed to a “living, breathing force” (Hipple, p.16, 1996). I think as a first year teacher without any curriculum guidance, I was so eager to be legitimate and teach my students tangible English concepts that I forgot the whole reason I went into teaching in the first place: to foster a love of reading. Without any real information about what my students were meant to learn, I latched onto the idea of literary terms and ran with it. But towards then end of the year, I had an empty feeling. What did it matter that my students were able to identify hyperbole?

The problem is I don’t feel as though my students have the “instinct or inclination” Probst mentions to always make personal connections with text in class discussion(Probst, p.33 , 1988). When I did try to discuss the issues characters face with the class in relation to their own lives it usually fell flat. There were few times when my class was engaged in a riveting discussion of a novel at all. Perhaps I am asking the wrong question, or not creating the right environment that would allow students to feel that emotional responses, rather than intellectual responses, are welcome. Sometime my “do now” prompts, which were almost always a personal question related to a theme in the text, would elicit so much argument and discussion I would become frustrated and shut down the discussion. I know students love talking about themselves, but arguing over what features you look for in a significant other without any connection to any discussion of literature made me uneasy. I need to find a way to have that energetic discussion in relation to the novel. Most importantly, I want to figure out how to make reading more a process of “making meaning about their own lives” and consideration of life and humanity rather than a means through which one learns literary elements. I loved English class because “of all the arts, literature is most immediately implicated with life itself” (as cited in Probst, p.34, 1998). If my students did was to recognize or sense this aspect of literature I would be thrilled.

Web Quest for The Color of Water

Although this webquest on James McBride’s The Color of Water did not specify the grade level, I imagine that it is for tenth grade students because I taught this text to students at this grade level last year. Apart from the fact that the webquest focuses on The Color of Water, it deals primarily with social problems in New York including poverty and racism. Students are given the opportunity to explore the social problems of poverty and racism and then to evaluate the public policies that have been implemented to address the problems. Then students are asked to assume the roles of public policy analysts and assigned the task of creating new and innovative policies that can improve the conditions and New York City and thus the lives of many people. Students are divided into groups of four and then asked to present an oral report and a short Power Point presentation that will be used by “the Mayor’s commission” to “solve future problems of bigotry and racism. In these reports students must include some highlights on the great contributions that African-Americans and Jews have made to American society, visuals, dance, drama, poetry, and recommendations to the Mayor’s Committee on racism and bigotry. Lastly, student presentations are then to be developed into essays that are a minimum of three pages.

Even though this webquest could be more streamlined, it seems to be fairly comprehensive because it introduces and defines the purpose of the student activities and their connection to The Color of Water, defines the tasks that students must complete, provides the process so that students can understand how to complete the tasks, offers web resources, provides a rubric for the student presentations, addresses the way in which students’ work will be evaluated, and mentions how New York State standards are incorporated into the activities. This webquest is highly stimulating and useful for student learning because it allows students to become public policy analysts in the process of exploring how literary themes exist in society. Also, I particularly liked this webquest because if offers multimodal learning and can appeal to oral and visual learners. The products of the webquest are substantial because students not only have to gather, assess, synthesize, and evaluate information but they also have to present their findings and recommendations in a variety of ways. This can truly ensure that students have processed and grasped content while building their critical thinking skills. While I am not entirely certain if the students’ recommendations for solving social problems are actually submitted to the Mayor’s commission, this is an excellent idea nevertheless.

http://www2.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/tips/t4prod/kleinwq2.html

Below, I have listed other webquests that I found appealing:

Night webquest
http://students.resa.net/bhsmc/ClassClicks/Peters/NIGHTwebquest.doc

Romeo and Juliet webquest
http://www.manteno.k12.il.us/webquest/high/LanguageArts/RomeoandJuliet/mainframe.html

The Outsiders webquest
http://outsiders06.tripod.com/

Web Quests for The House of Mango Street

After having heard several of my classmates present on The House of Mango Street, I am highly interested in teaching this novel to my freshman classes for the upcoming year. I anticipated teaching this novel last year, but it took me longer than expected to get through I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, by Maya Angelou. Although I have looked at a variety of web quests, I have narrowed my choices down to the ones listed below. I feel that these websites are the most streamlined of the bunch on the web and they are easy to navigate. Moreover, they have set aside specific benchmarks for the students with clear and engaging tasks.

http://coe.west.asu.edu/students/blarson/wquest/index.htm
The web site listed above is extremely well-organized and requires students to write a persuasive essay that explains “whether or not American students could spend a healthy, happy year immersed in the culture presented through a foreign exchange program in a Central or South American country.” This web quest is excellent because it provides a clear set of parameters for the students by breaking up the writing process into five steps:

1. Determining Research Categories
2. Organizing Research Information
3. Selecting Evaluative Criteria
4. Compiling the data
5. Peer Editing
6. Submitting the Product

The web quest has also provided a rubric to accompany this writing assignment.

One web quest that really requires students to employ their critical thinking skills can be seen at the following link: http://projects.edtech.sandi.net/kearny/myhouse/
Students are asked to justify the decisions that they make in designing a house with particular furnishings to represent Esperanza. This activity could be highly enjoyable for students and it really gets them to extend their thinking beyond the novel. They must perform a thorough character study of Esperanza in order to design a house that adequately displays her traits. This web quest also has a prepared rubric for evaluating students.

One final web quest that caught my attention gives students three tasks to choose from. These options are helpful in terms of differentiating the product and giving students some freedom to explore their interests. Students can either examine Esperanza’s interactions with other people through her conversations, create a mini-skit in conducting interviews and role-playing, or allowing students to create vignettes about their own lives. In any case, this web quest allows students to be as creative as they want.
http://webquest.org/questgarden/lessons/09571-051129200337/index.htm

Sunday, August 3, 2008

Names Do Hurt Us

Kajder, S. (2008). The book trailer: Engaging teens through technologies. Educational Leadership 65 (6)

"Garret has participated in programs that identified him as a struggling reader, a reluctant student, an at-risk student, and, most recently, a striving reader. And what has he learned? "School just tells what I'm not-how what I do outside doesn't count," he explained. Garret's low achievement in school led him to question his abilities, which led him to further disengage. "I stopped doing anything 'cause it wasn't going anywhere and I didn't see myself in any of it."

When I read this section of Kajder's "The Book Trailer: Engaging Teens Through Technology" I can't help but to remember all the days I was called names as a child growing up. Usually I just yelled mean things back and that would be the end of my hurt feelings for the moment. But after reading the above, I couldn't begin to imagine the mental toll the labeling which is so widely used in education has on our children. All the names that professionals used to label Garret were all hurtful and I feel as adults we often forget that students are smarter than we think. Just because we give something a fluffy name doesn't mean we are fooling anyone. It's sort of like how they used to label elementary classes. If you were in the Bees program versus the Hornets class, everyone knew which one was considered the slower class with or without the insect name.

After reading this quote I also realized again just how important it is to teach to different modalities and how important it is to honor and spotlight each student's strength, whether it falls in line with traditional skills which are valued in school, because in the real world someone who is power point genius is just as important as the next Jeffrey Deaver. And as educators we need to let our children know this, otherwise we will lose them and their talent.

So WHAT they are reading trash!

Hipple, T. (1996). It's the THAT, teacher. English Journal, 86 (3) 15-17

"The THAT of teenagers' reading is vastly more important than the WHAT."

All I could think was THANK YOU after reading the above quote. Finally, someone sees it the way I do. Over the past few years Urban Fiction has littered our classrooms, and teachers have trashed this genre left and right, and some of it rightly so. But some of this literature is worthy of being read. I feel when adults insult what teens are reading, the chances of that teen becoming an adult reader disappears. Instead of focusing on what these children are reading, I feel as educators we should use this as a springboard. It's like introducing vegetables to children. You start of with some broccoli, introduce some peas, and before you know it you have a vegan on your hands!

I understand some of the skepticism and criticism of these books are sparked by the racy content contained int eh pages, but I personally don’t see why they shouldn’t be able to read this genre; unless they will be barred from watching movies, television programs and walking through their neighborhoods where the same situations that appear in Street Fiction recur multiple times a day. The only thing I fear about children reading some of these books are perhaps them limiting their vocabulary and comprehension by reading some of the poorly written and edited ones, but you can find bad books in all genres.

Response - Luke Martin DeSiervo

“Most of our students, however, are going to be elsewhere. They’ll be in some line of work far removed from the literary world. They should, nonetheless, be readers. They should be people who enjoy literature, who read it willingly, even enthusiastically, and who respond to it and think about it in ways that enrich their emotional and intellectual lives.”

Probst, R.E. (1994). Reader-response theory and the English curriculum. English Journal
77, 37-44.

I remember reading a few of Robert Probst’s articles at the beginning of the semester and really taking to heart some of the ideas he set forth. Over the course of the summer, I have spent a lot of time trying to make sense of the previous year and thinking critically about how I want to approach my second go around in the classroom. I think more than anything else, I hope to present literature from a much more relaxed and enjoyable perspective. Probst is right—in the real world our students will be far removed from the English classroom. Perhaps the best thing we as English teachers can do is to inspire them to become independent thinkers who enjoy reading, or at the very least enjoy it a little more than they did before they arrived. In retrospect, at many times I felt so overwhelmed by the intense responsibility of making sure my students improved both as readers and writers that I lost track of the bigger picture. As of yet, no magic formula has been found to teach these important skills and we are left to discover the approach that works best in our particular classroom. But the more I think about, I am starting to realize that teaching students how to enjoy literature and the writing process are large pieces in this puzzle. While we work so hard trying to stress the most basic and fundamental skills to build a solid foundation, and rightfully so, I think we would all be surprised to see just how much our student’s skills can grow if we adjust our frame of mind and inspire them to enjoy the process.

I know full well that this is far from an easy task and I am not entirely sure how to turn this vision into a reality. I know I am going to have to work hard and experience many more failures before I ultimately find a method that works for me. But at least I know now that I can take it, and hopefully will not become nearly as frustrated as I did last year. On a more tangible level, I hope to change the perception of literature in my class by locating more interesting reading material that my students will be excited to experience. More than anything else, this course has opened me up to the wide world of young adult literature and helped me to see that if we want our students to become more interested in reading, we need to offer them materials and choices that they will enjoy. In addition, I plan to dedicate myself to modeling better habits and read in front of my students more often. Hopefully, this will create a genuine atmosphere in which reading is valued and respected.



“Contemporary young adult literature is an electrifying genre for getting today’s young adolescents reading and exploring who they are. Such literature contains themes, plots, language, and characters that are consistent with young adults’ experiences…Today’s young adult literature is sophisticates, complex, and powerful. It deserves to be a part of the literary tradition in middle and high schools.”

Stallworth, J.B. (2006). The relevance of young adult leadership. Educational
Leadership 63, 7, 59-63.

At the beginning of this course, I must admit that I was not as open-minded about young adult literature as I probably should have been. I’m not sure exactly why, but I assumed that reading these books would be childish and painful, and that it would have little impact on my day to day teaching practices. Yet as I read Stalllworth’s article, I am pleasantly surprised by how much my opinions have changed in these six weeks. Not only have I enjoyed reading the majority of these books, but I am impressed at how much studying the body of literature has helped me as teacher. One of the biggest adjustments I had to make in this profession was rediscovering what it meant to be a teenager. Being that it was not all that long ago that I was one myself, I assumed that I had an adequate understanding of the 14 year old mind and would be able to connect with their thinking and tendencies. For some reason, I assumed that teenagers were much more stable and able to function more effectively. (Actually, the more I think about it, it’s probably because I thought I knew everything when I was a teenager. Oh how wrong I was!) Of course my initial assessment proved to be far off base and I spent a lot of energy figuring out how vast the needs of teenagers are. Closer to childhood than adulthood, I have come to understand the guidance so many of our students are looking for and the positive influences needed to steer them in the right direction.

Getting back to young adult literature, I believe the genre has been a valuable tool that has helped me to better relate to my students. Putting me in touch with both their interest and abilities as readers, it has caused me to think about what I need to change in order to become a better teacher. Likewise, I now have a better grasp on the important role young adult literature can play and how it can be a valuable resource for our students. By presenting problems and characters that reflect their interests and points of view, teenagers can find solace in literature and most importantly, recognize that there are people out there that understand what they are going through. It offers a necessary reminder that these individuals are still growing, and we as teachers must modify our expectations accordingly. While I still maintain that no adult can truly remember what it feels like to be a teenager, reading these novels has helped me relate to my students and more fully understand their needs.

reaffirmation of books

ReLeah Cossett Lent (2008) quotes Nancy Atwell saying "her goal for is for students to become smarter, happier, more just, and more compassionate people because of the worlds they experience within those hundreds of thousands of black lines of print" (61). When I am asked why I teach reading and writing, I feel silly saying one's life can change through reading and writing, but that is exactly what I believe. I think if students can lose themselves in a book, they are learning how to focus, how to think, how to take time for themselves, how to take care of themselves, and how to understand other people. It is true that many books make people uncomfortable because of their subject matter. Teachers would prefer not to teach such books and parents would prefer their child refrain from reading such material. But when a book is censored, dialogue is denied with the student and the child, and a teachable moment is avoided at a great cost. Certainly, adults should be vigilant in regards to what children put into their minds, but adults also have to understand that the world is something of a terrible place. It is through books that we may understand how to navigate through the wretched and the terrible.

Lent, R. C. (2008). Facing the issues: Challenges, censorship, and reflection through dialogue. English Journal 97 (3), 61-66.

Kauer (2008) details an interaction with a parent: "she answered that she felt that so much of high school literature took people to a dark place" (58). This woman thought that the school's curriculum was "damaging their love of books" (58). Her children's love of books or her love of books? I wonder what kind of parent I will be. Will I force my views on my children to the extent that I shield them from essential pieces of literature? Teenagers understand the existence of "dark places." I was far more entertained by the gruesomeness of The lord of the flies than I ever was by anything Jane Austen wrote. Literature isn't nice. It doesn't have to be. It is fantastic and real. Certainly, the act of censorship brings more to the discussion of literature. It fans the flame of interest. If you ban it, if you forbid it, you better believe they will read it. Maybe it's all a trick to get kids reading. I wouldn't be so surprised if it was.

Kauer, S. M. (2008). A battle reconsidered: Second thoughts on censorship and conservative parents. English Journal 97 (3), 56-60.

YA Lit for Lifelong Readers

“The removal of a novel also cost students a unique opportunity for exploring the causes and consequences of bullying within the safety of a fictional account.” (Lent, 2008, p. 62)

“What we want is to excite them about reading while they are in school, help them share our love of it, so that they will remain readers when they are adults.” (Hipple, 1996, p. 17)

It wasn’t until this semester that my view of how to teach literature expanded to include YA novels not just as independent reading in my classroom library, but as core novels to be taught and studied. Although I did not rigidly adhere to the “traditional” literary canon of only the classics, I did not fully accept that contemporary YA novels could serve as valuable a purpose in the classroom as To Kill a Mockingbird or The Outsiders. Furthermore, I did not realize that my view of teen lit was so narrow.

I had several aha moments—when I caught myself impatient to get back to my apartment to rejoin Collin’s road trip (in Green’s An Abundance of Katherines), or when I sat on the edge of my seat as Lakshmi hid in the closet (in McCormick’s Sold), or when the gruesome imagery of Myers’ Exit Here kept me up half the night. Each time I was sucked into another well-crafted novel written for young adults, it sunk it a bit more that these books had literary merit, engaging characters, and relevancy. I admit that before I familiarized myself with YA fiction, teaching—or even recommending—books with mature language and content seemed dicey. As Hipple (1996, p. 16) notes, though, “adolescent literature typically focuses on adolescents’ problems and in their language, a language that often features epithets stronger than ‘oh my goodness’ or ‘shucks.’” I understood Lent’s warnings against self-censorship: the temptation to remove a book from a classroom library can be strong, as it might mean avoiding a confrontation with school leadership or parents. Similarly, as I read some of the YA novels I thought to myself, I could put this in my classroom in the Bronx, but what about back in Texas? The cultural, political, and religious climates of New York City and Magnolia, Texas are starkly different. While I could envision teaching Levithan’s Boy Meets Boy to my public school students in New York, I would probably leave it on the independent reading shelves if I had a classroom in some places south. The book is well-written; it addresses themes of friendship, love, loyalty, community, and coming of age; the story is engaging and preaches tolerance. I think kids could connect to it, and it could serve as a gateway to further literary and personal exploration: it has the potential to be one of those books that Hipple (1996, p. 17) says “could excite them about reading.” As a Humanities teacher, I hope that I can balance my role as a teacher and my role as a community member, to avoid harmful self-censorship that would deprive students of a valuable literary and life experience.

By writing about real issues facing teens, by connecting with them through their language and their scene, skilled YA authors are able to speak to young readers in ways that Austen, Dickens, and Hawthorne may not at this time in their lives. Because students can learn about good writing—masterful characterization, effective literary elements, a variety of techniques—and can be excited about reading through connecting with a YA novel, I have gained a great appreciation for the genre’s place in the middle and high school classroom.

References
Hipple, T. (1996). It’s the THAT, teacher. English Journal, 86(3), pp. 15-17.

Lent, R.C. (2008). Facing the issues: Challenges, censorship, and reflection through dialogue. English Journal, 97(3), pp. 61-66.

Reading Response

Lent, R.C. (2008). Facing the issues: Challenges, censorship, and reflection through dialogue. English Journal 97(3), 61-66.

" . . . reading is an experience that goes far beyond the current notion of comprehending for the purpose of distilling information into answers on tests. When students make choices about their reading, they are engaging in decisions that will contribute to their self-efficacy as well as ones that will facilitate their independence as readers."

With the extremely low rates of parental involvement I doubt that I will receive many complaints about what I choose to teach in class. However, I am still extremely aware of the role that reading could play in my students' lives. With ELA relegated to the task of teaching kids to read so that they can pass state tests, we have lost sight of what the interpretation of literature should and could be. Literature is not fluff; it aids in the creation of a whole person.


DeBenedictis, D. (2007). Sustained silent reading: Making adaptations. Voices from the Middle 14(3) 29-37)

"SSR now was divided into a 20-25-minute period to read, write, and/or draw (about what one is reading or writing), and then a 10-20-minute period to discuss the reading, writing, and/or drawing. Students had complete ownership of their reading and writing material, and, with prior permission, could work quietly with another student."

I love the images of SSR as presented by DeBenedictis. SSR in my classroom always felt like a chore for both me and my students. They resented the routine and I struggled to come up with meaningful methods of measuring their reading progress. This version of SSR is much more laid back than my approach. I tried to squeeze in a skill into every twenty-minute period so that no administrator could accuse me of not having my students do enough. As a result SSR was a complete failure. For the next year I would like to have SSR be something that my students enjoy: an opportunity for reflection and expression.

Outsiders Webquest Review

This webquest asks students to examine the events in The Outsiders from the perspective of a juror in a murder trial. It is essentially a jigsaw activity as students are given different roles in the case. For example Juror #1 has the responsibility of defining legal terms and researching murder statistics and minors and the death penalty. Students then report their findings in an online journal. Then in groups students are to debate using both the text and their internet findings as sources to determine a verdict in the trial. I would definitely use this activity with my students as it ties the events in the books to real life facts. It also provides students with a new lens with which to examine the events in the novel and present day incarceration statistics.

Incorporating Book Trailers and Audio-Books in the Classroom

Kajder, S. (2008). The book trailer: engaging teens through technology. Educational leadership. 65 (6), 1-4.


“When we teach creatively with emergent tools in mind, we stand a better chance of engaging reluctant students by giving what we teach real meaning. Each day is an invitation to examine, play, invent, reinvent, and join the conversation.”


In “The Book Trailer: Engaging Teens through Technologies,” Kajder explores the ways in which introducing technology, specifically the creation of book trailers, can invite even the most reluctant students to become engaged with literature. I was particularly struck by the above quote, pulled from Kajder's article, because any strategy that looks to draw students in and increase their motivation is something that I wish to become familiarized with. Above all else, supporting engagement and confidence in students is the most important thing I look to realize, and I spent a lot of time last year trying to think of ways to give what I was teaching “real meaning." As Kajder’s article explains, incorporating book trailers into our curriculum will not only accomplish this, but get students excited and invested in their work. The class featured in the article, with many students reading below level, demonstrates how this can be done. Kajder reveals how this formerly disengaged class experienced tremendous success with projects that involved an innovative product for a newly “invested, real audience.” Stemming from their success, I am eager to incorporate book trailers into my class projects next year.


Weiss, M.J. (2008). The sounds of stories. The alan review. 35 (3), 79-81.


“Letting students read aloud from their favorite books, emphasizing dramatic techniques and interpretation, is a practical way to develop fluency, listening skills, and oral interpretation.”


In “The Sound of Stories,” Weiss investigates the place of audio-books in the classroom. The above quote reflects his belief that audio-books provide an excellent format for students to develop their literacy, particularly fluency, listening skills, and oral interpretation. Weiss offers an extensive list of quality audio-books for young adult readers that includes: Melting Stones, Twisted, Airborn, and On the Wings of Heroes, among others. He further provides categorized lists of notable audio-books such as biographies, short-stories, and cultural diversity. I found his article, and particularly this selected quote, to leave an impression on me because it re-affirms the essential need of oral reading in the classroom. While I was aware of the benefits of read-alouds for students, this article reminds me just how important and advantageous oral reading is for students as they seek to develop literacy skills. The dramatic interpretation of a text can not only aid comprehension, but may engage students that otherwise would become disinterested by silent reading, alone. With this in mind, I am excited to introduce audio-books into my classroom next year, and in doing so, present students with another tool that may spark or enhance their love of literature.

Wikis and Literacy of Emotion & Images

Kajder, S. B. (2007) “Unleashing potential with emerging technologies”. In K. Beers, R.E. Probst, and L. Rief (Eds.) Adolescent literacy: Turning promise into practice (pp.213-229) Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Using the wikibooks.org website, we were able to so set up an annotated text to work alongside our study of the novel…. Our work include[d] various kinds of aids for reading, understanding, and teaching the text, including but not limite to explanatory notes, introductions summaries, questions and answers, charts, lists, indices, references wikilinks, pictures and audio. (p. 223)

Kajder noted that she got the idea to use this in her class when she saw her kids pull out CliffNotes on the class reading. This reminds me of how I sometimes refer my students to Sparknotes, and how they are all very familiar with the site. I checked out Wikibooks and, as described, all these features are available and available for classroom use. I am really excited about this use of technology since this is a format the kids are familiar with, and it engages them because now their knowledge and production would have a legitimate, authentic audience. Students now become teachers and dispenser of information through this medium. The technology is relatively simple so there is little if no explanation to how to use it – the kids have all read Wikipedia, and the same principles apply. My only concern (and surprise) is that this website is not very populated. I searched for popular books and came back with very little information. It is apparently only 5 years old, but I’m hoping more teachers would pick this up as a resource for the classroom. NOTE TO DR. GEORGE: please consider adding this component to next year’s technology class!!!

Kajder, S. B. (2008) “The book trailer: engaging teens through technologies.” Educational Leadership. Volume 65, Number 6: 4 pages

What worked well about Sam’s trailer was his ability to leverage each of these modes to create an effect that speech alone could not have conveyed. (p. 3)

In putting together my own book trailer I engaged on one of the most powerful modes of expression –using a combination of sound and image…. While putting together this one image of people being hanged, I could not articulate in words a viable emotional reaction. (More likely my eyes would skim over it and block its effect.) When I paired it with the cry of a cantor and an animated emphasizing effect, I amplified the emotional content of the image, and I was viscerally affected. These trailers give students the opportunity to see and create emotional texts, emotional expressions. And I do not think there is enough educational emphasis on the Literacy of images and emotion.

However, Kajder mentions that she does not work on tinkering with the applications with the kids, showing the “wows” of the product, I think this may be a mistake. Part of the process (for me at least,) of creating an emotionally expressive film is the affective dimension in its creation – that is, the discovery of the technology, the tinkering, the obsessive tinkering…. These are all an essential part of the learning process that should not be given short sh

Response to Kauer article on censorship

When the topic of book censorship arises – particularly in response to a parent who does not want their child to read a specific novel in school – a common reaction is to see the parent as somehow “crazy” and/or “close-minded.” Frequently, the assumption is that the parent has some sinister motive for wanting to “protect” their child from great works of literature and, as a result, is allowing the young person’s worldview to remain as narrow as possible.
However, as Suzanne Kauer (2008) explains in her article, “A Battle Reconsidered: Second Thoughts on Book Censorship and Conservative Parents,” parents usually have genuine reasons for their concerns and the best way to address their hesitations about a classroom book is to simply speak with them (p. 57). She notes parents’ concerns are typically limited to their individual children alone – not the entire class (p. 56, 2008). So it’s not as though there are thousands of fanatical crazies out there trying to get every copy of “The Chocolate War” pulled from school shelves. Instead, there are simply cautious parents trying to make decisions in the best interests of their children.
Kauer’s article is meant for teachers and she poses many excellent questions for K-12 educators to consider. For instance, she writes, “Do we choose books because they are what we were taught? Do we just choose what’s available, what the school bought? This may be our reality. But we have a responsibility, nonetheless, to thoroughly interrogate our curriculum and to make sure we know why we are arguing that a few damns and hells are worth reading to get to the heart of Steinbeck, and why little English boys murdering each other on an island is worth discussion” (Kauer, p. 59, 2008).
It is important for any/every teacher to know the answers to Kauer’s questions about the books they teach. It will help them lead classroom discussions about the texts, but to also have discussions with concerned parents as well.

Kauer, S. (January 2008). A battle reconsidered: second thoughts on book censorship and conservative parents. English Journal, 97(3) 56-60.

Webquest Review for Maus

Cited for 11th and 12th graders. This webquest assignment was very interesting to me but I have some doubts as to its appropriateness for high school students.

The quest jigsaws the class into several groups and asks each group to evaluate the book according to the groups’ field. The groups are: Art teachers, English teachers, Social Studies teachers and Holocaust Survivors. The three teacher groups must decide if Maus is appropriate to teach and the survivor group must decide if Maus is respectful or offensive to survivors.

Students in the groups are further jigsawed to read one of five web based and library based articles that support a position for the group. In the end the group comes together and puts together all their arguments that support or oppose a decision on a provided graphic organizer.

What I like about this webquest: The question seems rather simple but the reading content is rather sophisticated; it tackles everything from textual criticism, aesthetics, historical narrative, classroom standards – college level stuff. I guess that is also why I don’t like this webquest. The reading material is very sophisticated, in some cases the links are no longer there and in other cases the connection between the arguments that students need to make and the reading is a bit disconnected, students would have a hard time extrapolating.

I would appropriate some readings and perhaps one or two questions from this webquest, but I would NOT assign this to a (typical) 10th grade class reading Maus.

Since this is a core book for my curriculum I really wanted to explore everything available. I was surprised to find this is the ONLY webquest available! If anyone knows of an additional one Maus, please let me know!!!

Saturday, August 2, 2008

Webquest of Monster

I discovered a webquest for Monster that I will definitely refer back to next year when I use this text in literature circles. The webquest can be found at: www.garfield.sparcc.org/Middle/special_ed/Cozad/monster/MONSTER. I was particularly fond of this webquest, as opposed to the others that I reviewed, because I thought the webpage was easy to manage and the task itself to be worthwhile and thought-provoking for students. The page, that is, is easy to navigate with five sections that guide students through the assignment at hand. The project is centered on investigating juvenile delinquency and the death penalty and asks students to consider several higher-order thinking questions as they search related links and look to write their final essay on the topic. The attached rubric is also conveniently provided and clearly defines the expectations for the project. I will definitely use this webquest as a reference for next year and think it is a worthwhile site for anyone else teaching 8th grade to check out as well.

Lit Discussions and YA Lit

After taking the Adolescent Literature course, I have new ideas about how I will teach literature in my classes. Last school year, I was disappointed in the number of students who became excited about reading and books. I was overcome by fighting illiteracy, low efficacy, and low motivation in most of my classrooms. Probst’s experience of a classroom discussion session is what I want to see happen in my classroom literature discussions. “There was a first a lot of talking (this in itself is sounded good); very little listening. It was as if the reading had filled them with a passion and energy they could discharge only through speech. Gradually, however, the monologues became dialogues and kids began to hear what others were saying and to pause long enough to actually listen and reflect." (2000, p.9) Probst then goes on to talk about overly-guided discussion that occurs in many classrooms and its potential to suppress students’ urges to reflect on and discuss what they think about the literature. I felt in many ways this had occurred in my classroom, and was even encouraged by administrators as a way to maintain control of the classroom. Since literature discussion is what I want in my classrooms, I plan on attempting a freer structure with in-class reading time, free-write time, and class discussions. I don’t really like literature circles as they have been proposed to me, so I will try Probst’s suggestion of small group share in which each students speaks about what they free-wrote, and then large group share where conversation can take its own course. We’ll see what happens.

Probst, R. (2000). Literature as invitation, Voices from the Middle, 8 (2). pp. 9-15.

I had some strong reactions to the article, “It’s the THAT teacher.” I agree with some of arguments such as the one against fixations on classics and the traditional cannon of literature taught in secondary schools. I also agree that YA literature has a place in the secondary classroom and can lead to good thinking and good discussions, especially since many students are not prepared to read adult literature. However, I feel that adult literature should be the goal. I feel like Hipple’s argument, “enjoyment is what we’re after, at least at the secondary school level, where our students are going to grow up to be pediatricians and politicians, carpenters and car mechanics….but only very rarely English majors who need this early lit crit training.” (1996, pp. 16-17) I feel like the equivalent of the high-school student’s argument, “When are we ever going to have to use this?”

Which, actually, is a pretty good argument, as every teacher knows. Who needs physics or geometry proofs? What fun are they? I’m an English major, and I don’t ever have to use them, but I have an appreciation for them, understand that some people need them when designing a bridge or vehicle or theory about how the world works. What if we said “that” about math? “It’s not what kind of math students are doing, it’s that they’re doing math!” I somehow don’t think that argument would fly.

I feel like students should know higher literary ideas, symbols, extended metaphors exist, or they probably will not enjoy literature beyond a certain caliber. I happen to know a 7th grader personally, who attends a public school in a middle to lower class neighborhood, she plays video games, chats online, text messages, and loves to read. Her mother took her to the bookstore where she purchased adult-level books of her choice and read them each in a day. I gave her Speak and The Chocolate War to read, and after a few chapters, they languished on the couch, un-read. My theory is, they were too easy. The craft was not at a level that challenged her. Enjoyment is key, and no one enjoys learning something they are not ready to learn, but the opposite is true as well; no one enjoys being taught something they already know. Like I said before, YA lit has a place in the classroom, but as soon as students are able to move to adult literature, teachers should be ready to as well.

Hipple, T. (1996). It’s the THAT, teacher. English Journal. 86 (3). pp. 15-17.

Friday, August 1, 2008

Webquest: Drown by Junot Diaz

I explored webquest resources for Drown, a collection of short stories by Junot Díaz. The stories are set in both the Dominican Republic and the US, and they focus heavily on Dominican culture. To help my students understand the background of the country as well as the protagonist, I would suggest http://exploredominicanrepublic.com/links.html. This site provides links to statistical data, traditional music, history, travel information, and more. Also, some of the links are in Spanish, which could be extremely useful in my classroom. Unfortunately, some of the links do not work, but enough of them do that this site could be a great tool to introduce students to Dominican history and culture. The teacher would have to supplement the resources with questions or assignments, because the site is more information-based than activity-based.

I came across some additional websites that focused on the lives of Dominican immigrant children and Dominican writers, but I found problems with links and other technical issues. Overall, I did not have much luck finding webquests for Drown. A great class activity requiring critical thinking and technology would be to have the class create a webquest after reading the book. They could work in groups to create several different options, approaches, and themes.

Book Trailers and Literature Circles

Book Trailers

“But technology is not the goal. Student writers and readers are at the center of our instruction. And we, as mindful teachers, must thoughtfully and deliberately prepare all of our students for success by critically exploring the new technological tools and then using the ones that can help us and our students to powerfully convey what we think and know” (Kajder, 2008, p.4).

Kadger (2008) makes an important point about not using technology for technologies sake, a concern I have about utilizing it in the classroom. Technology cannot be used as a substitute for good teaching. If the technology or the way the technology is used does not supplement the students learning then it has no place in the classroom. “Student writers and readers are at the center of our instruction,” and the technology is only an element of this overarching goal. When used probably, technology can be a valuable component, especially in this technological era when students need to be able what they “think and know” in increasingly complex and innovative ways.

Kajder, S. (2008). The book trailer: Engaging teens through technologies. Educational Leadership 65 (6), pp. 1-4.

Literature Circles

“In our own Chicago schools, teachers rarely use role sheets, but instead have kids capture their responses in reading response logs, on sticky notes (the favorite tool by far), on homemade bookmarks (great for nonfiction), by using text coding, in drawn and graphic responses or written conversation” (Daniels, 2006, p. 12-13)

Though Daniels (2006) decries the overuse of role sheets for literature circles, it might have been my inexperience but I still found that assigning students roles was a significant part of my success with them. Due to the low skill levels of my students I felt that the role sheets truly helped them focus on the skills that I wanted them to practice. The more free response avenues that Daniel’s seems to want to implement would have been to confusing for my students I think. In that way role sheets I think are least an important early phase implementation for literature circles. Perhaps early in the year in the first literature circles role sheets can be used to teach the students the skills. As students increase in skill level then “reading response logs, on sticky notes,” etc. would work well to continue challenging the students.

Daniels, H. (2006). What’s the next best thing with literature circles?. Voices from the Middle. 13 (4), pp. 10-15.